The performance of a magnetic fluid based short bearing is examined with the effect of viscosity variation. The pressure temperature relation of Tipei (1962) concerning viscosity variation is adopted here. The Neuringer-Rosensweig’s model has been considered for the magnetic fluid flow. The related modified Reynolds type equation is solved for the calculation of pressure distribution leading to the computation of load bearing capacity. The graphical representations indicate that the positive effect of viscosity variation gets aided considerably by the ferrofluid lubrication.
Agrawal V. Magnetic Fluid based porous inclined slider bearing. Wear. 1986;(2):133–9.
2.
Ahmad N, Singh J. Magnetic Fluid lubrication of porous-pivoted slider bearing with slip velocity. J of Eng Trib. 2007;609–13.
3.
Basu S, Sengupta S, Ahuja B. Fundamentals of Tribology. . Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. 2005;
4.
Bhat M. Lubrication with a Magnetic fluid. Team Spirit (India) Pvt Ltd. 2003;
5.
Deheri G, Andharia P, Patel R. Transversely rough slider bearings with squeeze film formed by a magnetic fluid. Int J of Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2005;(1):53–76.
6.
Deheri G, Patel J. Magnetic fluid based squeeze film in a rough porous parallel plate slider bearing. Annals-J of Egg. 2011;(3):443–63.
7.
Lin J. Optimal design of one -dimensional porous slider bearing using the brinkman model. Tri Int. 2001;(1):57–64.
8.
Naduvinamani N, Kadadi A. Effect of Viscosity Variation on the Micropolar Fluid Squeeze Film Lubrication of a Short Journal Bearing. Advances in Tribology. 2013;1–7.
9.
Oladeinde M, Akpobi J. A study of load capacity of finite slider bearings with slip surfaces and Stokesian couple stress fluids. Int J of Eng Rea Afri. 2010;(2):57–66.
10.
Patel J, Deheri G. A comparison of porous structures on the performance of a magnetic fluid based rough short bearing. Trib in Ind. 2013;(3):177–89.
11.
Patel J, Deheri G. A comparison of different porous structures on the performance of a magnetic fluid based double porous layered rough slider bearing. Int J of Mate Lifetime. 2015;(1):29–39.
12.
Patel J, Deheri G. Performance of a Ferrofluid Based Rough Parallel Plate Slider Bearing: A Comparison of Three Magnetic Fluid Flow Models. Advances in Tribology. 2016;
13.
Patel J, Deheri G. A comparison of Magnetic fluid flow models on the behavior of a ferrofluid squeeze film in curved rough porous circular plates considering slip velocity. Iranian Journal of science and Technology. 2018;(4):2053–61.
14.
Patel J, Deheri G, Patel P. Ferrofluid lubrication of journal bearing with thermal effects. . Mathematics Today. 2018;92–9.
15.
Patel N, Vakharia D, Deheri G, Patel H. Experimental performance analysis of ferrofluid based hydrodynamic journal bearing with different combination of materials. Wear. 2017;1877–84.
16.
Prajapati B. On Certain Theoretical Studies in Hydrodynamic and Electromagneto hydrodynamic Lubrication. 1995;
17.
Rao R, Prasad K. Effects of Velocity-slip and viscosity variation on Journal bearings. ANZIAM J. 2004;143–55.
18.
Shah R, Bhat M. Magnetic Fluid based porous inclined slider bearing with velocity slip. Int Jour of App Mech and Eng. 2003;(2):331–6.
19.
Siddangouda A, Biradar T, Naduvinamani N. Combined effects of surface roughness and viscosity variation due to additives on long journal bearing. Tribology -Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces. 2013;(1):21–35.
20.
Sinha Prawal S, Chandan, Prasad K. Effect of viscosity variation due to lubricant additives in journal bearings. Wear. 1981;175–88.
21.
Tipei N. Theory of lubrication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1962;
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
