X-ray angiography is one of the diagnostic procedures applied in clinical practice to analyze the state of patient-specific coronary arteries. During this examination a parameter called fractional flow reserve (FFR) is invasively measured to quantitatively assess the existence of potential stenosis and its significance. The software proposed in this paper presents an alternative method to calculate a virtual FFR equivalent and this approach can reduce the cost and invasiveness of the diagnostic approach. The angiography images are used to perform a 3D reconstruction of the coronary artery, the finite element mesh is automatically generated and an adapted PAK software is used to perform blood flow simulations and calculate the FFR equivalent. The calculated values and the clinically measured values of FFR are compared in order to validate the proposed methodology and a good agreement of results is obtained. Within the developed software the user is also provided with options to analyze the distribution of relevant hemodynamic parameters in the arterial tree, which makes it a useful tool that provides assistance in patient-specific treatment planning.
Morris P, Vosse F, Lawford P, Hose D, Gunn J. Virtual (computed) fractional flow reserve: Current challenges and limitations. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015;8(8):1009–17.
2.
Morris PD, Silva Soto DA, Feher JFA, Rafiroiu D, Lungu A, Varma S, et al. Fast virtual fractional flow reserve based upon steady-state computational fluid dynamics analysis: Results from the VIRTU-Fast study. JACC Basic Translational Science. 2017;2(4):434–46.
3.
Zhang D, Lv S, Song X, Yuan F, Xu F, Zhang M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis. Heart. 2015;101(6):455–62.
4.
Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;63(12):1145–55.
5.
Yan Q, Xiao D, Jia Y, Ai D, Fan J, Song H, et al. A multidimensional CFD framework for fast patient-specific fractional flow reserve prediction. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2024;168:107718.
6.
Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, Lakkas LS, Nakatani S, Bourantas CV, et al. Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: Comparison with pressure wire–fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(5):574–83.
7.
Vukicevic A, Çimen S, Jagic N, Jovicic G, Frangi AF, Filipovic N. Three-dimensional reconstruction and NURBS-based structured meshing of coronary arteries from conventional X-ray angiography projection images. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1711.
8.
Djukic T, Tomasevic S, Saveljic I, Vukicevic A, Stankovic G, Filipovic N. Software for optimized virtual stenting of patient-specific coronary arteries reconstructed from angiography images. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2024;183:109311.
9.
Djukic T, Pavic O, Dasic L, Geroski T, Filipovic N. Automatization of 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries from angiography projections using AI-enhanced segmentation techniques. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Serbian International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (SICAAI. 2024.
10.
Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS book. 1995.
11.
Han C, Kwon SH. Cubic helical splines with Frenet-frame continuity. Computer Aided Geometric Design. 2011;28(7):395–406.
12.
Filipovic N, Mijailovic S, Tsuda A, Kojic M. An implicit algorithm within the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation for solving incompressible fluid flow with large boundary motions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2006;195:6347–61.
13.
Kojic M, Filipovic N, Stojanovic B, Kojic N. Computer modeling in bioengineering: Theoretical background, examples and software. 2008.
14.
Parodi O, Exarchos TP, Marraccini P, Vozzi F, Milosevic Z, Nikolic D, et al. Patient-specific prediction of coronary plaque growth from CTA angiography: A multiscale model for plaque formation and progression. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 2012;16(5):952–65.
15.
Rakocevic G, Djukic T, Filipovic N, Milutinovic V. Computational medicine in data mining and modeling. 2013.
16.
Gould KL. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circulation Research. 1978;43:242–53.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
