×
Home
Current Archive Editorial Board News Contact
Research paper

IMPLICIT STRESS INTEGRATION AND GOVERNING PARAMETER METHOD (GPM) AS A GENERAL CONCEPT FOR INELASTIC MATERIAL MODELS IN THE CODE PAK

By
Miloš Kojić
Miloš Kojić

Abstract

In this paper, we give a short overview of the basic concept of stress integration for inelastic material models. This methodology was introduced by the author, initially for thermo-elasticplastic and creep deformation of metals, termed as ‘effective-stress-function’ (ESF), and then generalized to the ‘governing parameter method’. These formulations were further implemented in several geological material models. The author built this methodology into the finite element program ADINA, while they were introduced into the PAK program by other PAK authors, after publications in the relevant journals given here in the list of references. This methodology has also been extended to other material models cited here in the references, and served as the basic concept for these models. Only a few simple examples are borrowed from our previous publications since numerous applications of the PAK code over decades to real engineering problems are available in references, in various journals, reports, and books; some of these are given in this monograph.

References

1.
Bathe KJ. *Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis*. 1982.
2.
Desai CS, Siriwardane HJ. *Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials*. 1984.
3.
Kojić M, Bathe KJ. *Inelastic Analysis of Solids and Structures*. 2005.
4.
Kojić M, Bathe KJ. The effective-stress-function algorithm for thermo-elasto-plasticity and creep. *International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1987;24:1509–32.
5.
Simo JC, Taylor RL. A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity. *International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1986;22:649–70.
6.
Smith JO, Sidebottom OM. *Inelastic Behavior of Load-Carrying Members*. 1965.
7.
Wood DM. *Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics*. 1990.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.