Heart wall tissue plays a crucial role in living organisms by generating the mechanical force for blood flow. This tissue has a complex internal structure comprised mostly of muscle cells, in which biochemical energy is transformed into mechanical active stress under rhythmical electrical excitation. The overall heart functioning depends, among other physiological conditions, on the mechanical properties of the tissue. Over the past centuries, experimental and theoretical investigations have been conducted in order to establish the constitutive laws governing wall tissue behavior. Regarding computational modeling, many material models have been introduced, from simple elastic anisotropic to more sophisticated ones, based on various formulations of strain potentials. We here present a novel computational model that directly employs experimental constitutive relationships. Therefore, we avoid any fitting of material parameters for a selected analytical form of the constitutive law. Hysteretic characteristics of the tissue are included, as well as either incompressibility or compressibility according to experimentally determined curves. Deformation is split into deviatoric and volumetric parts in order to handle compressibility. The correctness and accuracy of the model is demonstrated through simple cases for loading and unloading conditions. Furthermore, the model was implemented for left ventricle (LV) deformation, where the FE mesh was generated from echocardiography recordings. Here, a specific algorithm, which accounts for LV torsion, was introduced to determine trajectories of material points on the internal LV surface. Hysteresis of the constitutive curves was used to calculate mechanical energy of LV wall tissue deformation. For completeness, the fluid flow within the LV was computed as well.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
7
Bogdan Milićević, Miljan Milošević, Vladimir Simić, Danijela Trifunović, Goran Stanković, Nenad Filipović, Miloš Kojić
(2023)
Cardiac hypertrophy simulations using parametric and echocardiography-based left ventricle model with shell finite elements
Computers in Biology and Medicine, 157()
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106742
Reidmen Aróstica, David Nolte, Aaron Brown, Amadeus Gebauer, Elias Karabelas, Javiera Jilberto, Matteo Salvador, Michele Bucelli, Roberto Piersanti, Kasra Osouli, Christoph Augustin, Henrik Finsberg, Lei Shi, Marc Hirschvogel, Martin Pfaller, Pasquale Claudio Africa, Matthias Gsell, Alison Marsden, David Nordsletten, Francesco Regazzoni, Gernot Plank, Joakim Sundnes, Luca Dede’, Mathias Peirlinck, Vijay Vedula, Wolfgang Wall, Cristóbal Bertoglio
(2025)
A software benchmark for cardiac elastodynamics
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 435()
10.1016/j.cma.2024.117485
Faizan Ahmad, James Paul Barnett, Ali Bienemann, Carol-Ann Janes, Peter Theobald
(2026)
Quantifying Regional and Age-Dependent Microstructural Changes in Porcine Ventricles from Neonatal to Adulthood Using DT-MRI and TPEF-SHG Microscopy
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, ()
10.1007/s10439-026-04143-4
Miloš Kojić, Miljan Milošević, Arturas Ziemys
(2023)
Computational Models in Biomedical Engineering
, ()
10.1016/B978-0-323-88472-3.00007-4
Bogdan Milićević, Nenad Filipović
(2024)
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
, ()
10.1007/978-3-031-60044-9_13
Miljan Milosevic, Bogdan Milicevic, Vladimir Simic, Milos Anic, Milos Kojic, Djordje Jakovljevic, Nenad Filipovic
(2023)
Application of In Silico Trials for the Investigation of Drug Effects on Cardiomyopathy-Diseased Heart Cycle Properties
Applied Sciences, 13(21)
10.3390/app132111780
Bogdan Milićević, Miloš Ivanović, Boban Stojanović, Miljan Milošević, Miloš Kojić, Nenad Filipović
(2022)
Huxley muscle model surrogates for high-speed multi-scale simulations of cardiac contraction
Computers in Biology and Medicine, 149()
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105963The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.