×
Home
Current Archive Editorial Board News Contact
Research paper

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN JOINT UNDER ACCIDENTAL IMPACT

By
Sergey Savin
Sergey Savin

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to create a universal computational model of a plane-stressed joint element, which could be implemented as a special finite element of the beam-column subassembly integrated into the FEA procedure to improve its accuracy. The combination both of the finite element method and the finite difference method has been accepted to simulate the structural behavior of monolithic reinforced concrete joints of building frames. The finite difference method is used directly for analysis the stress-strain state of a 2D stressed member of a monolithic joint, and the FEM is used for preliminary obtaining the conditions on the contour of this plane stressed member. The proposed model allows considering the discrete reinforcement, as well as the disruption of the adhesion of the reinforcing bars to concrete matrix along the contact surface. For the purposes of implementing the model, an algorithm for the stress-strain state analysis of the beam-column joint is proposed. An example of calculating an experimental frame unit based on the proposed approach is considered.

References

1.
Alanani M, Ehab M, Salem H. Progressive collapse assessment of precast prestressed reinforced concrete beams using applied element method. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2020;13:e00457.
2.
Almazov V, Plotnikov A, Rastorguev B. Problems of building resistance to progressive collapse. Vestnik MGSU. 2011;16–20.
3.
Ahmadi R, Rashidian O, Abbasnia R, Nav M, Usefi F, N. Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Behavior in Scaled RC Beam-Column Subassemblage. Shock Vib. 2016;1–17.
4.
Building Code of Russian Federation SP 63.13330.2018. 2019;
5.
En ; English. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures -Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. 1992;
6.
Fedorova NV, Ngoc VT. Deformation and failure of monolithic reinforced concrete frames under special actions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1425(1):012033.
7.
Fedorova N, Vu NT, Yakovenko I. Strength criterion for plane stress reinforced concrete element under a special action. Vestn MGSU. 2020;1513–22.
8.
Feng DC, Wu G, Lu Y. Numerical Investigation on the Progressive Collapse Behavior of Precast Reinforced Concrete Frame Subassemblages. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2018;32(3).
9.
Feng DC, Xie SC, Ning CL, Liang SX. Investigation of Modeling Strategies for Progressive Collapse Analysis of RC Frame Structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2019;33(6).
10.
Geniyev G, Kisyuk V, Tyupin G. Plasticity theory of concrete and reinforced concrete. 1974;
11.
Geniyev G. On Dynamic effects in bar structural systems made of physically nonlinear fragile materials. Promyshlennoye i grazhdanskoye Stroit. 1999;23–4.
12.
Gorodetskiy A, Strelets-Streletskiy E, Zhuravlev V, Vodop’yanov R. Lira-CAD. Chapter I. Basics. Publishing LIRALAND. 2019;154.
13.
Gudmundsson G, Izzuddin B. The “sudden column loss” idealisation for disproportionate collapse assessment. Struct Eng. 2008;(6):22–6.
14.
Hayati N, Hamid A. Seismic Performance of Interior Beam-Column Joint With Fuse-Bar Designed Using Ec8 Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading. 2015;
15.
Hwang S, Lee H. Analytical Model for Predicting Shear Strengths of Interior Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance. ACI Struct J. 2000;35–44.
16.
Izzuddin BA, Vlassis AG, Elghazouli AY, Nethercot DA. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework. Engineering Structures. 2008;30(5):1308–18.
17.
Kai Q, Li B. Dynamic performance of RC beam-column substructures under the scenario of the loss of a corner column—Experimental results. Engineering Structures. 2012;42:154–67.
18.
Klyueva N, Korenkov P. A device for the experimental determination of dynamic loading in frame-rod structural systems. 2018;
19.
Kolchunov V, Fedorova N, Savin S, Kovalev V, Iliushchenko T. Failure simulation of a RC multi-storey building frame with prestressed girders. Mag Civ Eng. 2019;92:155–62.
20.
Kolchunov V, Savin S;, Kolchunov V, Fedorova N, Savin S, Kovalev V, et al. Failure simulation of a RC multi-storey building frame with prestressed girders. Mag Civ Eng. 2018;155–62.
21.
Li Y, Lu X, Guan H, Ren P. Numerical investigation of progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete frames subject to column removals from different stories. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2016;19(2):314–26.
22.
Marjanishvili S, Agnew E. Comparison of Various Procedures for Progressive Collapse Analysis. J Perform Constr Facil. 2006;(365):4.
23.
Sasani M, Werner A, Kazemi A. Bar fracture modeling in progressive collapse analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Structures. 2011;33(2):401–9.
24.
Savin SY, Kolchunov VI, Korenkov PA. Experimental research methodology for the deformation of RC frame under instantaneous loss of column. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;962(2):022054.
25.
Shan L, Petrone F, Kunnath S. Robustness of RC buildings to progressive collapse: Influence of building height. Engineering Structures. 2019;183:690–701.
26.
Tsonos AG. Effectiveness of CFRP-jackets and RC-jackets in post-earthquake and pre-earthquake retrofitting of beam–column subassemblages. Engineering Structures. 2008;30(3):777–93.
27.
Wang H, Zhang A, Li Y, Yan. A Review on Progressive Collapse of Building Structures. Open Civ Eng J. 2014;183–92.
28.
Yu J, Tan K. Structural Behavior of RC Beam-Column Subassemblages under a Middle Column Removal Scenario. J Struct Eng. 2013;233–50.
29.
Yu J, Tan KH. Structural Behavior of RC Beam-Column Subassemblages under a Middle Column Removal Scenario. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2013;139(2):233–50.
30.
Yu J, Luo L, Li Y. Numerical study of progressive collapse resistance of RC beam-slab substructures under perimeter column removal scenarios. Engineering Structures. 2018;159:14–27.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.